James Cameron Warns Military AI Could Trigger a Real-Life Skynet

eWEEK content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More.

In 1984, theatergoers were introduced to a chilling vision of the future where artificial intelligence waged a war of extermination against the human race. The movie was “Terminator,” and 41 years later, its director, James Cameron, warns that the premise of his ground-breaking action flick could soon become reality.

A ‘Terminator-style’ future no longer feels far off

In a recent interview with Rolling Stone to promote the release of the book “Ghosts of Hiroshima,” which Cameron plans to adapt to the screen, the blockbuster director shared his thoughts on the future of AI in war and creativity.

“I do think there’s still a danger of a Terminator-style apocalypse where you put AI together with weapons systems,” Cameron said, “even up to the level of nuclear weapon systems, nuclear defense counterstrike, all that stuff.”

Even a decade ago, the “Avatar” and “Titanic” director’s words might have still sounded like a doomsayer. But the AI and arms race do seem to be more intertwined now — a scenario that seemed like science fiction not long ago.

In April, the Department of Defense began the second phase of military AI adoption, which started back in 2017, called Project Maven. While confined to using generative AI to support ground operations and intelligence analysis, it’s not a stretch to imagine a time when AI will be used in making more critical decisions.

The military’s growing dependence on AI

“Because the theater of operations is so rapid, the decision windows are so fast, it would take a super-intelligence to be able to process it, and maybe we’ll be smart and keep a human in the loop,” Cameron added. “But humans are fallible, and there have been a lot of mistakes made that have put us right on the brink of international incidents that could have led to nuclear war. So I don’t know.”

Some human rights groups echo Cameron’s doubts, citing the ethics of using AI to compile lists of targets or to suggest actions based on intelligence data processed and analyzed by AI. Defense contractors claim that they require human oversight in any AI decision.

The commitment to keeping a “human in the loop,” however, is becoming increasingly more difficult as the military relies on larger and more complex datasets to make decisions. AI models and generative AI can process complex data faster than any human, potentially replacing traditional military intelligence analysis processes.

The Department of Defense is going full steam ahead with advancing its AI capabilities. It recently partnered with tech companies Anduril, Scale AI, and Palantir to gather and process surveillance and intelligence data. But controlling this data may be problematic. Palantir, for instance, uses Microsoft to provide AI tools for the military, trained using classified military datasets.

Cameron’s creative warning about human limits

It’s hard not to see the rapid integration of AI into the military as a stepping stone to Cameron’s nightmarish but so far fictional future. In the “Terminator” franchise, an AI network called Skynet is given increasing access to military systems until it becomes self-aware and decides that the time of humankind is over. 

Cameron doesn’t believe that AI could ever “move an audience” the way a human could, since it’s “just regurgitating what other embodied minds have said — about the life that they’ve had, about love, about lying, about fear, about mortality.” But perhaps it’s AI’s lack of understanding about the human condition that will doom us in the end.