Who are you, and why are you emailing me? The role of email signatures in personalization — Stripo.email

In email marketing, we constantly talk about personalization. It’s everywhere: in subject lines, content, and calls to action. But here’s something that caught my attention—why do we rarely discuss sender personalization?

An email isn’t just us writing to the recipient. It’s a conversation between two people: the reader and the sender. Yet, most strategies focus solely on the former.

That’s why I put together this article—not as an academic study or a tutorial, but as a collection of observations, expert opinions, case studies, and personal insights from conversations with email marketers and market analysis. My goal was to understand: when does a signature like “David, Marketer” actually work? When does it lead to unsubscribes? When is a brand name more appropriate than a personal sender? And how does this impact brand perception, engagement metrics, and trust?

To gain a deeper perspective on what truly matters from the recipient’s side, I consulted with Galina Panasyuk, a long-time expert in the field. Her experience spans multiple industries, from eCommerce to service-based businesses. She has worked with diverse audiences across various countries, handling millions of subscribers. Her insights are invaluable for this discussion.

Industry-specific trends and expert insights: When personalization works—and when it backfires

According to Jay Schwedelson, emails sent from a specific individual rather than a brand can achieve up to 4.5 times higher open rates in B2B and 2.75 times higher in B2C. In other words, recipients are more likely to open an email when they recognize a familiar or at least a human-sounding sender. This creates a sense of dialogue rather than an impersonal mass blast—especially valuable in B2B, where direct communication and trust are key.

However, the effect isn’t always straightforward. Name recognition plays a critical role. If the email comes from an unfamiliar person, it can trigger anxiety rather than trust.

The effectiveness of personalized sender names in email marketing heavily depends on industry specifics. Open rates must be considered in the context of who the email is being sent to and why. Average open rates vary significantly across industries, and the sender’s name carries different weight depending on the sector.

SaaS and B2B: The power of human connection

In B2B, especially within SaaS (Software as a Service), where the audience consists of professional users, the human factor is crucial. These relationships rely on trust, expertise, and a sense of direct communication. The average open rate in this category is around 22–23%, though recent aggregator data suggests it can reach 35% if the sender is a well-known figure within the company, such as the CEO, Head of Product, or a key expert.

Using a real name and title isn’t just about increasing open rates—it also affects engagement. In non-commercial B2B sectors, this is particularly evident: emails from department heads or recognized experts achieve higher open rates because recipients recognize and trust the sender, sometimes even having direct contact with them.

One example from our experience: at Stripo, we run a Product Pulse digest featuring product updates, typically sent by our email marketer in a standard newsletter format. However, since the content was actually prepared by our COO, Dmytro, we decided to align the sender name accordingly.

Surprisingly, the open rate didn’t change as dramatically as I expected—but what did change was engagement. At the end of the email, we included a quick survey asking, “Was this email informative to you?” and “Would you like to receive similar updates?” Once we switched the sender to the COO, recipients became significantly more responsive—completing the survey, leaving comments, and even replying directly. This reinforced the perception of trust and importance.

Email from Stripo’s marketer

Email from Stripo’s COO

eCommerce and B2C: When brand recognition matters more than a personal name

In online retail and other B2C sectors, the sender’s name also plays a role, but it operates differently. Open rates in this space are historically lower—around 17–20% on average—which makes sense given the volume of promotional emails subscribers receive daily. Competition for attention is fierce, and the first thing a recipient notices is brand recognition, not a specific employee’s name.

That’s why emails from a verified brand name often inspire more trust than those from “Bob the Marketer”—especially if the recipient has never interacted with Bob before. In fact, if an email lands in an expected promotional time slot but is signed by an unfamiliar name, it might lead to confusion or even irritation. This disrupts the familiar pattern: the recipient expects a promo from a known brand but receives something “personal” instead, causing cognitive dissonance.

However, this doesn’t mean that personalized signatures are impossible in eCommerce. On the contrary, they can be effective, but only if they are integrated into the strategy in a thoughtful and deliberate way. Some large brands use hybrid schemes where the employee’s name is combined with the brand name: for example, “Oleksandr from Comfy.” This gives the feeling of live communication while not detaching the email from the brand the subscriber is familiar with. This approach is particularly relevant in triggered emails, where support or engagement is more important than simply promoting an offer.

The key here is to define areas of responsibility: where a person’s name is appropriate and where only the brand name should be used. For example:

• promotional emails, special offers, and seasonal discounts are always more logical to send from the brand. These communications aim for maximum clicks, and a personal name here would only get in the way;

This trend is confirmed by a study from GoDaddy, where about 60% of consumers said they trust emails sent from a brand’s name more than those sent by an employee or company owner. A brand name in the “From” field provides a clear understanding of who is writing and reduces the likelihood of confusion, doubt, or the feeling of spam. This is why many eCommerce and travel brands prefer to stick to corporate communication—especially if the sender isn’t a widely recognized figure to most of their customers.

Another important point here is sender verification. If a brand uses its name in the “From” field, it’s also necessary to activate sender authentication (e.g., BIMI in Gmail or other email clients). This boosts trust and shows that the sender is verified and legitimate, not a fake account or spammer. In the era of phishing and email fraud, this plays a crucial role.

• welcome email sequences, product usage tips, and feedback collection emails are areas where a specific employee’s name can be used, provided it fits into the strategy and is accompanied by context.

It all boils down to the KPIs that marketers set at the planning stage. If the goal of the campaign is fast clicks and mass reach, the brand name works best. If the goal is to build trust, initiate engagement, and drive involvement, then personal names should be added.

But—this is critically important—you can’t just use a personal name “for the sake of it.”

If you decide to add a name to the email, explain who this person is and why they are writing. Set the right tone of voice, create context, and show that there’s a real person behind the email who’s interested in engaging in dialogue. Only then will such an email be perceived as appropriate and sincere. Otherwise, it will appear to be a forced trick—and the recipient will reject it.

Thus, in B2C, it’s important to develop a signature strategy from the very beginning. Separate roles, understand where the brand, the person, and the hybrid mix should be. And make each email part of a cohesive communication system, not just a one-off attempt to add “warmth” to the template.

Tourism and the travel industry: Personalization based on perception

Email marketing in the tourism industry holds a special place. It’s one of the few B2C segments where the subject of emails immediately triggers an emotional response. Travel inspires, and vacation dreams captivate. This is exactly what allows for more personalization than in classic retail.

According to research, the average open rate in the travel industry is around 20%, slightly higher than in other B2C sectors. The reason is simple: emails about trips, tours, and vacations evoke an emotional reaction, especially when they are visually and linguistically well-designed.

In this industry, a personalized signature can truly work powerfully, but only in the right context. If an email is sent on behalf of a personal travel agent or consultant, offering to choose an itinerary, remind about travel details, or warn about a discount, it is perceived as care. This is especially true for high-end travel, where every detail and personal approach—tailored to names, interests, and past travel history—matters.

In the premium segment, an email can be more than just communication—it can be an accompaniment: an email from “your travel manager” with a name, a real email address, and a clear purpose. As a result, engagement is high.

But all of this works only if the processes are perfectly aligned. Once something breaks in the chain—wrong route, wrong hotel, wrong date—personalization becomes a vulnerability. When a user expects precision from their manager, they feel doubly upset. In such cases, a brand signature is a safe and stable choice. Especially if the company is large, with a wide reach and a flow of offers. For these brands, it’s important to maintain consistency and not create false expectations of personal contact if it won’t happen.

Context is the decisive factor. As Galina pointed out, it’s not so much the signature that matters but the overall communication. The way the recipient is addressed, the content of the email, its purpose, and the level of engagement all determine which type of signature will be appropriate. In the travel industry, there is a huge variety of emails:

• discount and promotional hotel emails;
• flight offer selections based on destination;
• information about route changes;
• personalized offers based on travel history;
• support before, during, and after travel, etc.

 Each category requires its own tone and sender.

The signature as a strategic element in emails

Recently, our team faced a task: gathering a pool of users to participate in a new blog section dedicated to email marketers’ case studies. We weren’t just looking for numbers—we wanted real stories. To get such cases, we needed to reach out to people personally. So, we decided to send an email on behalf of Alina, the author of this section and the blog’s content editor.

The email was simple and direct: an introduction to the new section, an invitation to share experiences, a link to the questionnaire, and a proposal to contribute to content creation. No discounts, no flashy headlines—just a real email from a real person with a clear request. And it worked. We started receiving completed questionnaires and responses. Recipients engaged because they felt a personal invitation—not from a brand, not from a faceless “editorial team,” but from a specific person with a real task.

Another crucial point is how frequently you change the signature. If you switch senders too often, it raises suspicion. Subscribers start feeling like they’re dealing with a staged act rather than real people. This is especially problematic if the emails remain identical, only the sender’s name changes. It doesn’t build trust—quite the opposite. Loyalty is built through consistency, just like in real relationships.

That’s why, if you introduce a new sender, consider who they are, what role they play, and what types of emails would logically come from them. Plan the scenario:

1. How often do they appear?
2. How do they write?
3. How do they respond to feedback?

Without this, a signature is just a visual trick. And when there’s nothing behind it, trust crumbles.

This leads to another important factor: the overall impact of email signatures on brand perception.

Brand perception: The signature as a factor of trust and image

A signature in an email is not just a way to enhance personalization. It is part of the brand’s communication code, directly influencing trust, loyalty, and, ultimately, the company’s image. How a brand speaks to its subscribers in emails, whose voice it uses, and how consistent this messaging is—all of this determines whether people perceive the brand as genuine and honest or as an abstract marketing machine.

Humanizing the brand: When it works

When an email is signed by a real person—especially someone who is genuinely involved in what the email discusses—the brand feels closer. However, this doesn’t mean turning the entire email communication into a performance with fake characters.

For example, an email from the company’s CEO is appropriate when:

• communicating with investors or partners;
• sharing strategic changes;
• inviting recipients to exclusive events;
• announcing important corporate updates.

However, if a CEO’s signature appears under an email with the subject line “Your order has been placed!”—it creates distrust and an ironic smile. The recipient feels they are being deceived, which undermines trust. The same applies to signatures from “CTOs,” “community managers,” or “growth team experts” if these individuals are not publicly recognized or visible. A signature should be authentic and justified.

Don’t create characters—build a system

As Galina rightly said, there is no need to create dozens of fictional personas. The key is not the number of names but ensuring each one is linked to a specific area of responsibility. This way, the recipients won’t get confused or sense artificiality. Instead, they will become familiar with the communication style of each sender.

For example:

• Alina, the author of the email marketing case study section, genuinely collects these stories and communicates with marketers;
• Olha, the Head of Content, can send emails to blog subscribers (which I occasionally do myself)—and it will feel organic;
• Dmytro, the company’s COO, shares product updates because he is directly involved in these processes;
• Oleksandr, the email marketer managing email sequences, signs off on behavioral and triggered emails because he is responsible for the strategy.

In all other cases, a branded signature is more appropriate—especially for promotional emails or technical notifications. “Maria, Busfor team” or “Artem, blog editorial team” can also work if the person represents a specific project but their name is not widely known to the audience.

Consistency = Trust

Recipients become accustomed to the “voice” of an email. They recognize who sends which type of information. This builds expectations—and expectations are the foundation of trust. Once you start mixing styles and signatures and introducing seven different names within a month, it creates chaos and artificiality and weakens the connection.

A signature is not just a line at the bottom of an email. It is the brand’s representative at a specific point in the subscriber journey. And if it behaves in a human way, knows what it’s talking about, remains consistent, and doesn’t feel forced—the brand itself will be perceived the same way.

And if we talk about brand perception in general, it’s worth noting that if email marketing genuinely aims for personalization, it should consider not just subscriber behavior but also cultural factors. A recipient’s country, business etiquette, national characteristics, and even the timing of an email—all affect how an email is perceived and, consequently, its effectiveness. This is particularly true when it comes to the “From” field.

Regional specifics: How culture and mentality influence sender perception

For example, the American audience is accustomed to informal communication. In the Middle East, interactions remain more traditional and formal. Addressing someone by name without a title is taboo. A signature like “Maria from the Support team” might be seen as disrespectful, especially when addressing an important client.

The French value formality. Even in a personal email, using titles like Monsieur or Madame before the recipient’s last name is essential. A signature such as “Antoine from the Support Team” is acceptable, but the email itself must maintain a reserved, professional tone. Respect for language and etiquette is key to successful communication.

Meanwhile, in China and Japan, hierarchy and status form the foundation of communication. A sender’s name must always be accompanied by a title, and using one’s first name is only acceptable after establishing a trusting relationship. Without this, the email may come across as impolite. In many cases, even internal company emails start with a title and surname.

International email marketing requires micro-strategies tailored to each region. An email that works perfectly in New York might be perceived as disrespectful in Dubai or too impersonal in Paris. And this is not just a matter of preference—it directly impacts effectiveness.

Cultural context determines:

• which sender is perceived as trustworthy;
• which forms of address are acceptable;
• what level of personalization is appropriate;
• when an email is more likely to be opened eagerly;
• whether informal tone and humor are suitable;
• how the sender’s gender and position are perceived.

Ideally, when designing an email communication strategy, separate scenarios should be created for key cultural clusters. This isn’t just a trend—it’s a proven way to build trust and increase engagement.

One of the most important factors in any strategy is measurable results.

Conversions: The signature as a trust and action trigger

The primary metrics in email marketing that receive the most attention are Open Rate (OR) and Click-Through Rate (CTR). However, even the highest OR and CTR won’t yield results if the next step isn’t taken. That’s why we must always analyze whether the clickable, “alive” sender actually led to the target action.

Across most industries, conversion rates typically range between 1% and 5%, depending on the segment:

• in eCommerce, conversion rates may be around 1–2%;
• in SaaS and B2B, particularly with highly targeted segmentation, conversion rates tend to be higher, though the volume of recipients is lower.

A well-crafted sender signature helps widen the top of the funnel by increasing open rates and click-throughs. From there, the email content and offer take over. Therefore, optimizing the sender signature isn’t a replacement for a strong product—it’s a catalyst for improving the entire conversion chain.

If there’s any doubt, testing is a must. A/B testing sender signatures is a powerful tool, especially when done strategically:

• brand vs. individual: Does an email from a company perform better than one from a named person?
• different roles: Compare an email from an email marketer vs. an email from the CEO;
• different tones: One version is more formal, the other more conversational.

Important note: Avoid A/B testing on broad campaigns like newsletters or welcome emails—statistical differences will likely be insignificant. Focus on high-impact emails such as abandoned cart emails, contract or agreement emails, and demo invitations. These scenarios can reveal real differences in recipient perception and response.

Sometimes, an email from the company performs better than one from an individual, especially if:

• the content is technical, straightforward, or purely informational;
• the recipient is accustomed to a stable, brand-consistent tone;
• a personal signature might feel out of place or create a disconnect.

In such cases, forcing personalization for the sake of personalization doesn’t make sense. It’s better to send the email from the brand and maintain a consistent perception.

Wrapping up

Personalized signatures in email campaigns can significantly impact performance—but only when integrated into a thoughtful strategy. Simply adding a name and photo isn’t enough. The approach must be logical, structured, and aligned with the overall email communication plan.

Key takeaways:

1. Start with strategy, not creativity. Personalization should be embedded into your email marketing framework. Instead of randomly testing sender names, ask:
   
   “Where in the recipient journey does a personal sender make sense, and where should it be the brand?”
2. Create a sender map. Define which emails come from whom: When should the brand be the sender? When should an individual represent the company? When does a hybrid approach make sense (e.g., Hanna from [Company name])?
3. Use A/B testing wisely. Don’t just measure the Open Rate—analyze the quality of interactions. Sometimes, a CEO’s signature won’t increase open rates but will improve engagement and response quality. Focus on meaning, not just numbers.
4. Be mindful of cultural differences. What works in one region may not work in another. For example, gender pronouns (he/she/they) are common in the U.S. but may be inappropriate in Arab countries. Always consider local context before scaling a template.
5. Content is primary; the signature is a supporting factor. A sender signature won’t save a weak email copy. It won’t sell a poor offer. But it will enhance a strong message, adding credibility and a human touch. The signature is a finishing touch, not the foundation.
6. Don’t overload recipients with characters. Too many different senders can confuse recipients and erode trust. Keep a clear, structured system: “One person stands behind this project and is accountable for it.”
7. Consistency builds trust. If an email comes from the Head of Product, follow-ups on the same topic should also come from them. If recipients reply, ensure their response goes to a real inbox—otherwise, you lose the feeling of real communication you’ve worked so hard to build.

The sender’s signature bridges the brand and the recipient. If done intentionally, it strengthens the connection. If done randomly, it risks weakening it.